Group Actions Notes - Important Theorems

Group Actions -Important Theorems

Group Actions Notes - Important Theorems trace back to the foundational concepts of group theory within Mathematics. They provide a deeper understanding of the interaction between groups and sets through actions. These concepts have been widely used in various disciplines, including geometry, physics, and computer science.

What You Will Learn?

  In this post, you will explore:

  • Theorem-1: Let \((G,\circ )\) be a group and \(S\) be a non-empty set and \(S\) be a G-Set. Then prove that \(\big[G:G_{a} \big]=|[a]| \) for \(a\in S\).
  • Theorem-2: Let \((G,\circ )\) be a group and \(S\) be a non-empty set and \(S\) be a G-Set. If \(S\) is finite then \(|S|=\displaystyle\sum_{a\in A}^{}\big[G:G_{a} \big] \) where \(A\) is a subset of S containing exactly one element from each orbit \([a]\).
  • Theorem-3: Let \((G,\circ )\) be a group and \(S\) be a non-empty set and \(S\) be a G-Set. Then the action of \(G\) on \(S\) induces a homomorphism from \(G\) on \(A(S)\), where \(A(S)\) is the group of all permutations of \(S\).
  • Extended Cayley’s Theorem: Let \((G,\circ )\) be a group and \(H\) be a subgroup of \(G\). Let \(S=\set{aH: a\in G} \). Then there exists a homomorphism \(\psi: G \to A(S)\) such that \(Ker~\psi\subseteq H\).

Things to Remember

Before diving into this post, make sure you are familiar with: Basic Definitions and Concepts of
  1. Set Theory
  2. Relations
  3. Mappings
  4. Group Theory

Introduction

  Group Actions – Important Theorems serve as a cornerstone in the study of Group Theory. Group actions define how groups interact with mathematical objects and help understand symmetry, combinatorics, and algebraic structures. This study is crucial for solving problems in Mathematics.

Theorem-1

  Statement:

  Let \((G,\circ )\) be a group and \(S\) be a non-empty set and \(S\) be a G-Set. Then prove that \(\big[G:G_{a} \big]=\big|[a]\big| \) for \(a\in S\).


  Proof:
  Given that \((G,\circ )\) is a group and \(S\) is a non-empty set and \(S\) is a G-Set.
  Let \(\cdot :G\times S \to S\) be an action of \(G\) on \(S\).
  Let \(\rho\) be the equivalence relation on \(S\) defined by \(\forall~\alpha,\beta \in S \), \(\alpha\rho \beta\iff g\cdot \alpha=\beta \) for some \(g\in G\).
  Let \(a\in S\). Then we have \(G_{a}=\set{g\in G:~ g\cdot a=a}\) and \([a]=\set{x\in S:~ g\cdot a=x,~ g\in G}\).
  Let \(P\) be the set of all left cosets of \(G_{a}\) in G.
  To prove that \(\big[G:G_{a} \big]=|[a]| \)
  Let us construct a mapping \(f:P\to [a]\) such that \begin{align*} f(gG_{a})=g\cdot a \text{ where }g\in G \end{align*}   Then we have to prove that \(f\) is bijective.

  • To prove \(f\) is well defined
    Let \(p,q\in G \) then \(pG_{a},qG_{a}\in P \) such that \begin{align*} & pG_{a}=qG_{a} \\ \implies & q^{-1}\circ p\in G_{a}\\ \implies & \big(q^{-1}\circ p\big) \cdot a=a\\ \implies & q^{-1}\cdot\big( p \cdot a\big)=a\\ \implies & q\cdot\big(q^{-1}\cdot\big( p \cdot a\big)\big)=q\cdot a\\ \implies & \big(q\circ q^{-1}\big)\cdot\big( p \cdot a\big)=q\cdot a\\ \implies & e\cdot\big( p \cdot a\big)=q\cdot a\\ \implies & p\cdot a=q\cdot a\\ \implies & f\big(pG_{a}\big)=f\big(qG_{a}\big) \end{align*} \(\therefore\) \(f\) is well defined.
  • To prove \(f\) is injective
    Let \(p,q\in G \) then \(pG_{a},qG_{a}\in P \) such that \begin{align*} & f\big(pG_{a}\big)=f\big(qG_{a}\big) \\ \implies & p\cdot a=q\cdot a\\ \implies & q^{-1}\cdot\big(p\cdot a\big)=q^{-1}\cdot\big(q\cdot a\big)\\ \implies & \big(q^{-1}\circ p\big) \cdot a=\big(q^{-1}\circ q \big)\cdot a\\ \implies & \big(q^{-1}\circ p\big) \cdot a=e\cdot a\\ \implies & \big(q^{-1}\circ p\big) \cdot a= a\\ \implies & q^{-1}\circ p\in G_{a}\\ \implies & pG_{a}=qG_{a} \\ \end{align*} \(\therefore\) \(f\) is injective.
  • To prove \(f\) is surjective
    Let \(x\in [a] \). Then there exists an element \(g\in G\) such that
    \begin{align*} & g\cdot a =x \\ \implies & f\big(gG_{a} \big)=x \end{align*} \(\therefore gG_{a}\) is the pre-image of \(x\) in \(P\). Since \(x\) is an arbitrary element of \([a]\), therefore each member of \([a]\) has a pre-image in \(P\).
    \(\therefore\) \(f\) is surjective.

  Hence \(\big[G:G_{a} \big]=\big|[a]\big| \).

Theorem-2

  Statement:

  Let \((G,\circ )\) be a group and \(S\) be a non-empty set and \(S\) be a G-Set. If \(S\) is finite then \(|S|=\displaystyle\sum_{a\in A}^{}\big[G:G_{a} \big] \) where \(A\) is a subset of S containing exactly one element from each orbit \([a]\).


  Proof:
  Given that \((G,\circ )\) is a group and \(S\) is a non-empty set and \(S\) is a G-Set.
  Let \(\cdot :G\times S \to S\) be an action of \(G\) on \(S\).
  Let \(\rho\) be the equivalence relation on \(S\) defined by \(\forall~\alpha,\beta \in S \), \(\alpha\rho \beta\iff g\cdot \alpha=\beta \) for some \(g\in G\).
  Then \(S\) can be partitioned as the union of orbits of \(G\).
  \(A\) is a subset of S containing exactly one element from each orbit \([a]\). Therefore \begin{align*} & S=\cup_{a\in A}[a]\\ \implies & |S|=\displaystyle\sum_{a\in A}^{}\big|[a]\big|\\ \implies & |S|= \displaystyle\sum_{a\in A}^{}\big[G:G_{a} \big]\\ &\big[\because~\big[G:G_{a} \big]=\big|[a]\big|\big] \end{align*}

Theorem-3

  Statement:

  Let \((G,\circ )\) be a group and \(S\) be a non-empty set and \(S\) be a G-Set. Then the action of \(G\) on \(S\) induces a homomorphism from \(G\) onto \(A(S)\), where \(A(S)\) is the group of all permutations of \(S\).


  Proof:
  Given that \((G,\circ )\) is a group and \(S\) is a non-empty set and \(S\) is a G-Set and \(A(S)\) is the group of all permutations of \(S\).
  Let \(\cdot :G\times S \to S\) be an action of \(G\) on \(S\).
  Let \(g\in G\) and let us define a mapping \(\tau_{g}:S\to S\) such that \(\tau_{g}(a)=g\cdot a,~a\in S\).

  • To prove \(\tau_{g}\) is well-defined
    Let \(a,b\in S\) such that \begin{align*} & a=b \\ \implies & g\cdot a = g\cdot b~ \big[\because \cdot\text{ is well-defined} \big]\\ \implies & \tau_{g}(a)=\tau_{g}(b) \end{align*} \(\therefore\) \(\tau_{g}\) is well-defined.
  • To prove \(\tau_{g}\) is injective
    Let \(a,b\in S\) such that \begin{align*} & \tau_{g}(a)=\tau_{g}(b) \\ \implies & g\cdot a = g\cdot b\\ \implies & g^{-1}\cdot\big(g\cdot a\big) = g^{-1}\cdot\big(g\cdot b\big)\\ \implies & \big(g^{-1}\circ g\big)\cdot a = \big(g^{-1}\circ g\big)\cdot b\\ \implies & e\cdot a = e\cdot b~ \big[\text{ where e is the identity element of G} \big]\\ \implies & a=b \end{align*} \(\therefore\) \(\tau_{g}\) is injective.
  • To prove \(\tau_{g}\) is surjective
    Let \(c\in S\) then \begin{align*} & c=e\cdot c\\ \implies & c= \big(g\circ g^{-1}\big)\cdot c\\ \implies & c= g\cdot \big(g^{-1} \cdot c\big)\\ \implies & c= \tau_{g} \big(g^{-1} \cdot c\big)\\ \end{align*} \(\therefore g^{-1} \cdot c\) is the pre-image of \(c \) under \(\tau_{g}\). Since \(c \) is an arbitrary element of \(S\) then each member of \(S\) has a pre-image in \(S\), \(\therefore\) \(\tau_{g}\) is surjective.

  \(\therefore\) \(\tau_{g}\) is bijective \(\implies \tau_{g}=A(S)\).
  Now let us define a mapping \(\psi:G\to A(S) \) such that \(\psi(g)=\tau_{g}~,~g\in G\).

  • To prove \(\psi\) is well-defined.
    Let \(g_{1},g_{2} \in G\) such that \( g_{1}= g_{2} \). Let \(s\in S \) \begin{align*} & \tau_{g_{1}}(s)=g_{1}\cdot s~\forall s\in S \\ \implies & \tau_{g_{1}}(s)=g_{2}\cdot s~\forall s\in S \\ \implies & \tau_{g_{1}}(s)=\tau_{g_{2}} (s)~\forall s\in S\\ \implies & \tau_{g_{1}}=\tau_{g_{2}} \\ \implies & \psi(g_{1})=\psi(g_{2}) \end{align*} \(\therefore\) \(\psi\) is well-defined.
  • To prove \(\psi\) is surjective.
    Let \(\tau_{g}\in A(S)\) for some \(g\in G\) then \(\psi(g)=\tau_{g} \). Therefore \(\tau_{g}\) has a pre-image \(g\in G\). Since \(\tau_{g}\) is an arbitrary element of \(A(S)\), then each member of \(A(S)\) has a pre-image in \(G\).
    \(\therefore\) \(\psi\) is surjective.
  • To prove \(\psi\) is homomorphism.
    Let \(g_{1},g_{2} \in G\) then \begin{align*} \psi\big(g_{1}\circ g_{2} \big)=\tau_{g_{1}\circ g_{2}} \end{align*} Let \(s\in S\) then \begin{align*} &\tau_{g_{1}\circ g_{2}}(s)=\big(g_{1}\circ g_{2} \big)\cdot s~\forall~s\in S\\ \implies & \tau_{g_{1}\circ g_{2}}(s)=g_{1}\cdot \big(g_{2} \cdot s\big)~\forall~s\in S\\ \implies & \tau_{g_{1}\circ g_{2}}(s)=\tau_{g_{1}} \big(g_{2} \cdot s\big)~\forall~s\in S\\ \implies & \tau_{g_{1}\circ g_{2}}(s)=\tau_{g_{1}} \big(\tau_{g_{2}}( s)\big)~\forall~s\in S\\ \implies & \tau_{g_{1}\circ g_{2}}(s)=\big(\tau_{g_{1}}\circ \tau_{g_{2}}\big)( s)~\forall~s\in S\\ \implies & \tau_{g_{1}\circ g_{2}}=\tau_{g_{1}}\circ \tau_{g_{2}}\\ \implies & \psi\big(g_{1}\circ g_{2} \big)=\psi\big(g_{1} \big)\circ \psi\big(g_{2} \big)\\ \end{align*} \(\therefore\) \(\psi\) is homomorphism.

  Hence the theorem is proved.

Extended Cayley's Theorem

  Statement:

  Let \((G,\circ )\) be a group and \(H\) be a subgroup of \(G\). Let \(S=\set{aH: a\in G} \). Then there exists a homomorphism \(\psi: G \to A(S)\) such that \(Ker~\psi\subseteq H\).


  Proof:
  Given that \((G,\circ )\) is a group and \(H\) is a subgroup of \(G\) and Let \(S=\set{aH: a\in G} \).
  Let us construct a mapping \(\cdot: G\times S \to S\) such that \(g\cdot(aH)=(g\circ a)H\) where \(g,a\in G\).
  First we prove that \(\cdot\) is an action of \(G\) on \(S\).

  • To prove that \(\cdot\) is well-defined.
    Let \(\big(g_{1},aH\big)~,~\big(g_{2},bH\big)\in G\times S\) such that \begin{align*} & \big(g_{1},aH\big)=\big(g_{2},bH\big)\\ \implies & g_{1}=g_{2},~aH=bH\\ \implies & g_{1}\cdot(aH)=g_{2}\cdot(bH)\\ \implies & \cdot \big(g_{1},aH\big)=\cdot \big(g_{2},bH\big) \end{align*} \(\therefore\) \(\cdot\) is well-defined.
  • To prove that \(\cdot\) is an action.
    • Let \(g_{1},g_{2}\in G\) and \(aH\in S \) for some \(a\in G\)
      \begin{align*} &\big( g_{1}\circ g_{2} \big)\cdot aH \\ =&\big[\big( g_{1}\circ g_{2} \big)\circ a\big] H\\ =&\big[ g_{1}\circ \big(g_{2} \circ a\big)\big] H\\ =& g_{1}\cdot \big[ \big(g_{2} \circ a\big)H\big]\\ =& g_{1}\cdot \big( g_{2} \cdot aH\big) \end{align*}
    • Let \(e\) be the identity element of \(G \) and \(aH\in S \) for some \(a\in G\)
      \begin{align*} e\cdot aH =\big( e\circ a \big)H = aH \end{align*}
    \(\therefore\) \(\cdot\) is an action.

  Let consider the mapping \(\tau_{g}:S\to S\) such that \(\tau_{g}(aH)=g\cdot aH\) for some \(g,a\in G\).
  Then this action \(G\) on \(s\) induces the homomorphism \(\psi : G \to A(S)\) such that \(\psi(g)=\tau_{g}\)
  Now to prove that \(Ker~\psi\subseteq H\)
  Let \(I_{A} \) is the indentity mapping on \(A(S)\) \begin{align*} & x\in ker~\psi \\ \implies & \psi(x)=I_{A}\\ \implies & \tau_{x}=I_{A}\\ \implies & \tau_{x}(aH)=I_{A}(aH)~\forall~aH\in S\\ \implies & x\cdot aH=aH~\forall~aH\in S\\ \implies & \big( x\circ a \big)H=aH~\forall~aH\in S\\ \implies & \big( x\circ a \big)\circ a^{-1} \in H~\forall~a\in G \\ \implies & x\circ \big(a \circ a^{-1}\big) \in H~\forall~a\in G \\ \implies & x\circ e \in H \\ \implies & x \in H \\ \implies & Ker~\psi\subseteq H \end{align*}   Hence the theorem is proved.

Applications

  Group Actions are crucial in a wide range of applications across mathematics and science. In geometry, group actions help classify shapes and structures based on their symmetries. In physics, they are used to study conservation laws and quantum mechanics. Group actions also play a role in coding theory, providing solutions to problems in communication systems. For further study, explore Relations and Ring Theory.

Conclusion

  Understanding Group Actions – Important Theorems enhances problem-solving skills in abstract algebra and its applications. These notes are fundamental for students and researchers focusing on Abstract Algebra and its impact on modern mathematical developments.

References

  1. Introduction to Group Theory by Benjamin Steinberg
  2. Topics in Group Theory by Geoffrey Smith
  3. Abstract Algebra by David S. Dummit and Richard M. Foote
  4. Algebra by Michael Artin
  5. Symmetry and Group Theory by Mark A. Armstrong

FAQs

  1. What are group actions in mathematics?
    Group actions describe how a group operates on a set, preserving its structure and properties.
  2. What are some applications of group actions?
    Group actions are applied in geometry, number theory, and theoretical physics.
  3. Why are group actions important in algebra?
    They provide insights into symmetry and facilitate the study of mathematical structures.
  4. What is an example of a group action?
    Rotations of a square by a cyclic group represent a group action.
  5. What is the orbit of a group action?
    The orbit is the set of all elements a group element can map to under the action.
  6. What is the stabilizer in group actions?
    The stabilizer is the subgroup of elements in a group that keeps a point fixed under action.
  7. How do group actions relate to symmetry?
    Group actions formalize the concept of symmetry by describing transformations preserving structure.
  8. What is the importance of group actions in combinatorics?
    Group actions help solve counting problems using orbits and stabilizers.
  9. Are group actions used in computer science?
    Yes, they are applied in algorithms, cryptography, and coding theory.
  10. Where can I practice questions on group actions?
    Explore Abstract Algebra Questions for exercises on this topic.
Scroll to Top