In this lesson, we explore the concept of an optimal solution in linear programming (LPP) through essential theorems and rigorous proofs. By understanding these key principles, you will learn how every extreme point relates to a basic feasible solution and why convex combinations of extreme points yield optimal outcomes. This post is designed for learners seeking clear, concise, and actionable insights into LPP optimization.
Key Concepts in Optimal Solutions for Linear Programming
Linear programming involves finding the best outcome in a mathematical model whose requirements are represented by linear relationships. The idea of an optimal solution is central to LPP. In the sections below, we discuss two critical theorems that explain how optimality is achieved. Furthermore, the proofs provided use straightforward logic and active language to help you understand each step clearly.
Theorem 4: Extreme Points and Basic Feasible Solutions
Statement
Every extreme point of a convex set of all feasible solutions in a linear programming problem corresponds to a basic feasible solution.
Proof
Consider the linear programming problem (LPP) defined as:
\[ \text{Maximize } z = \bar{c}\bar{x} \] \[ \text{Subject to } \bar{A}\bar{x} = \bar{b} \quad \text{and} \quad \bar{x} \ge 0 \]
Here, \(\bar{c} = [c_i]_{1\times n}\), \(\bar{x} = [x_i]_{n\times 1}\), \(\bar{b} = [b_i]_{1\times m}\), and \(\bar{A} = [a_{ij}]_{m\times n}\). Let \(H\) be the set of all feasible solutions. Assume that \(\bar{\alpha} = (\alpha_1, \alpha_2, \dots, \alpha_n)\) is an extreme point in \(H\) satisfying \(\bar{A}\bar{\alpha} = \bar{b}\) and \(\bar{\alpha} \ge 0\).
To prove that \(\bar{\alpha}\) is a basic feasible solution, suppose without loss of generality that the first \(m\) components of \(\bar{\alpha}\) are positive. Let \(\bar{a}_1, \bar{a}_2, \dots, \bar{a}_m\) be the corresponding columns of \(\bar{A}\). Then, \[ \sum_{i=1}^{m} \alpha_i \bar{a}_i = \bar{b}. \]
If these columns are linearly dependent, there exist scalars \(\lambda_i\) (not all zero) such that \[ \sum_{i=1}^{m} \lambda_i \bar{a}_i = \bar{0}. \] Choose a nonzero \(\lambda_p\) and a small positive \(\beta\). Multiplying the above by \(\beta\) and adding to (and subtracting from) the initial equation, we form two new solutions:
\[ \sum_{i=1}^{m} \left[\alpha_i + \beta\lambda_i\right] \bar{a}_i = \bar{b} \quad \text{and} \quad \sum_{i=1}^{m} \left[\alpha_i – \beta\lambda_i\right] \bar{a}_i = \bar{b}. \]
Define the vectors \[ \bar{u} = (\alpha_1 + \beta\lambda_1, \alpha_2 + \beta\lambda_2, \dots, \alpha_m + \beta\lambda_m, 0, \dots, 0) \] and \[ \bar{v} = (\alpha_1 – \beta\lambda_1, \alpha_2 – \beta\lambda_2, \dots, \alpha_m – \beta\lambda_m, 0, \dots, 0). \] Both \(\bar{u}\) and \(\bar{v}\) satisfy the constraints and are feasible solutions. Moreover, \(\bar{\alpha}\) can be written as the convex combination \[ \bar{\alpha} = \frac{1}{2}\bar{u} + \frac{1}{2}\bar{v}. \]
However, this contradicts the assumption that \(\bar{\alpha}\) is an extreme point. Therefore, the columns \(\bar{a}_1, \bar{a}_2, \dots, \bar{a}_m\) must be linearly independent, confirming that \(\bar{\alpha}\) is indeed a basic feasible solution.
Theorem 5: Optimality Through Convex Combinations
Statement
If the objective function reaches its optimal value at more than one extreme point of a convex feasible set in a linear programming problem, then every convex combination of those extreme points also yields the optimal objective value.
Proof
Consider again the LPP:
\[ \text{Maximize } z = \bar{c}\bar{x} \] \[ \text{Subject to } \bar{A}\bar{x} = \bar{b} \quad \text{and} \quad \bar{x} \ge 0. \]
Let \(H\) denote the set of all feasible solutions and assume that \(\bar{\alpha}_1, \bar{\alpha}_2, \dots, \bar{\alpha}_p\) are extreme points where \[ \bar{c}\bar{\alpha}_1 = \bar{c}\bar{\alpha}_2 = \dots = \bar{c}\bar{\alpha}_p = z_m. \] Now, let \(\bar{\beta}\) be any convex combination of these extreme points: \[ \bar{\beta} = \sum_{i=1}^{p} \lambda_i \bar{\alpha}_i \quad \text{with} \quad \sum_{i=1}^{p} \lambda_i = 1. \]
Then, the objective function value for \(\bar{\beta}\) is: \[ \bar{c}\bar{\beta} = \sum_{i=1}^{p} \lambda_i \bar{c}\bar{\alpha}_i = \sum_{i=1}^{p} \lambda_i z_m = z_m \sum_{i=1}^{p} \lambda_i = z_m. \] Therefore, every convex combination of these extreme points achieves the optimal value, proving the theorem.
Summary and Key Takeaways
In summary, these theorems underscore the vital role of extreme points in determining an optimal solution for linear programming problems. The first theorem confirms that every extreme point is a basic feasible solution, while the second demonstrates that convex combinations of optimal extreme points maintain the optimal value. Consequently, understanding these properties not only deepens your knowledge of LPP but also enhances your ability to solve optimization problems efficiently.
Moreover, these insights offer a robust foundation for further study in optimization theory, ensuring that you are well-equipped to tackle more advanced topics in operations research.
Related Docs
FAQs
Inner Product Space
- What is an inner product space?
An inner product space is a vector space equipped with an additional structure called an inner product. The inner product allows for the definition of geometric concepts such as length, angle, and orthogonality.
- What is an inner product?
An inner product is a function that takes two vectors from the vector space and returns a scalar, typically denoted as ( langle u, v rangle ) for vectors ( u ) and ( v ). This function must satisfy certain properties: linearity in the first argument, symmetry, and positive-definiteness.
- What are the properties of an inner product?
- Linearity in the first argument:** ( langle au + bv, w rangle = a langle u, w rangle + b langle v, w rangle ) for all scalars ( a, b ) and vectors ( u, v, w ).
- Symmetry:** ( langle u, v rangle = langle v, u rangle ) for all vectors ( u, v ).
- Positive-definiteness:** ( langle u, u rangle geq 0 ) for all vectors ( u ), and ( langle u, u rangle = 0 ) if and only if ( u ) is the zero vector.
- How does the inner product relate to the norm of a vector?
The norm (or length) of a vector ( u ) in an inner product space is defined as the square root of the inner product of the vector with itself, i.e., ( |u| = sqrt{langle u, u rangle} ).
- What is orthogonality in an inner product space?
Two vectors ( u ) and ( v ) are orthogonal if their inner product is zero, i.e., ( langle u, v rangle = 0 ). Orthogonality generalizes the concept of perpendicularity in Euclidean space.
- What is the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality?
The Cauchy-Schwarz inequality states that for all vectors ( u ) and ( v ) in an inner product space, ( |langle u, v rangle| leq |u| |v| ). This inequality is fundamental in the study of inner product spaces.
- What is an orthonormal basis?
An orthonormal basis of an inner product space is a basis consisting of vectors that are all orthogonal to each other and each have unit norm. This means that for an orthonormal basis ( {e_1, e_2, ldots, e_n} ), ( langle e_i, e_j rangle = 1 ) if ( i = j ) and ( 0 ) otherwise.
- How do you project a vector onto another vector in an inner product space?
The projection of a vector ( u ) onto a vector ( v ) is given by ( left(frac{langle u, v rangle}{langle v, v rangle}right) v ). This formula uses the inner product to find the scalar component of ( u ) in the direction of ( v ).
- What is the Gram-Schmidt process?
The Gram-Schmidt process is a method for orthonormalizing a set of vectors in an inner product space. Given a set of linearly independent vectors, the process constructs an orthonormal set of vectors that spans the same subspace.
