Table of Contents

    Introduction

    Welcome to an in-depth exploration of rational automorphisms in group theory. In this lesson, we examine the elegant proof that demonstrates the automorphism group of the additive group of rational numbers, \(\operatorname{Aut}(\mathbb{Q},+)\), is isomorphic to the multiplicative group of nonzero rational numbers, \((\mathbb{Q}^*,\cdot)\). This result highlights the beautiful interplay between additive and multiplicative structures within the realm of abstract algebra.

    Through clear, step-by-step reasoning and rigorous proof techniques, you will gain valuable insights into how these two seemingly distinct groups share a profound structural similarity. Our discussion emphasizes the concept of rational automorphisms, making this topic accessible to both newcomers and seasoned mathematicians alike.

    Problem


    Prove that \(\operatorname{Aut}(\mathbb{Q},+)\) is isomorphic with \((\mathbb{Q}^*,\cdot)\).


    Solution

    Step 1

    To determine the form of an automorphism

    Since \((\mathbb{Q},+)\) is a cyclic group generated by \(1\), any automorphism \(\varphi: \mathbb{Q} \to \mathbb{Q}\) is completely determined by \(\varphi(1)\). In fact, for any \(r \in \mathbb{Q}\), \[ \varphi(r) = r \cdot \varphi(1) \]

    Step 2

    Let us define the mapping

    \[ f: \operatorname{Aut}(\mathbb{Q},+) \to \mathbb{Q}^* \] by \[ f(\varphi) = \varphi(1) \] Note that \(\mathbb{Q}^*\) denotes the set of nonzero rational numbers under multiplication.

    Step 3

    To prove \(f\) is well-defined

    We must verify that for any automorphism \(\varphi \in \operatorname{Aut}(\mathbb{Q},+)\), the element \(\varphi(1)\) is nonzero, i.e., \(\varphi(1) \in \mathbb{Q}^*\). If \(\varphi(1) = 0\), then for every \(r \in \mathbb{Q}\) we would have \[ \varphi(r) = r \cdot \varphi(1) = 0 \] which contradicts the fact that \(\varphi\) is an isomorphism (since it would not be injective). Therefore, \(\varphi(1) \neq 0\) and \(f(\varphi) \in \mathbb{Q}^*\). This shows that \(f\) is well-defined.

    Step 4

    To prove \(f\) is a homomorphism

    Let \(\varphi, \psi \in \operatorname{Aut}(\mathbb{Q},+)\). Then for any \(r \in \mathbb{Q}\),

    \begin{align} f(\varphi \circ \psi) &= (\varphi \circ \psi)(1) \nonumber\\ &= \varphi\big(\psi(1)\big) \nonumber\\ &= \varphi(1) \, \psi(1) \nonumber\\ &= f(\varphi) \, f(\psi)\nonumber \end{align}

    Step 5

    To prove \(f\) is injective

    Let \(f(\varphi) = f(\psi)\); that is, \(\varphi(1) = \psi(1)\). Then for any \(r \in \mathbb{Q}\),

    \begin{align} \varphi(r) &= r \cdot \varphi(1) \nonumber\\ &= r \cdot \psi(1) \nonumber\\ &= \psi(r) \nonumber \end{align}

    Hence, \(\varphi = \psi\) and \(f\) is injective.

    Step 6

    To prove \(f\) is surjective

    For any \(q \in \mathbb{Q}^*\), define \(\varphi_q: \mathbb{Q} \to \mathbb{Q}\) by \[ \varphi_q(r) = q \cdot r \] It is straightforward to check that \(\varphi_q\) is an automorphism of \((\mathbb{Q},+)\) and \[ f(\varphi_q) = \varphi_q(1) = q \] Thus, \(f\) is surjective.

    Step 7

    To prove \(f\) is isomorphism

    Since \(f\) is a bijective homomorphism, then \[ \operatorname{Aut}(\mathbb{Q},+) \cong \mathbb{Q}^* \]

    Summary


    Every automorphism of \((\mathbb{Q},+)\) is determined by its effect on the generator \(1\), so they have the form \(\varphi(r)=r \cdot q\) for some \(q\in \mathbb{Q}^*\). Defining \(f(\varphi)=q\) yields an isomorphism \(f: \operatorname{Aut}(\mathbb{Q},+) \to \mathbb{Q}^*\). Hence, \(\operatorname{Aut}(\mathbb{Q},+)\) is isomorphic to \((\mathbb{Q}^*,\cdot)\).

    FAQs

    Partial Differential Equations

    • What is a partial differential equation (PDE)?

      A PDE is an equation that involves unknown multivariable functions and their partial derivatives. It describes how the function changes with respect to multiple independent variables. 

    • How do PDEs differ from ordinary differential equations (ODEs)?

      Unlike ODEs, which involve derivatives with respect to a single variable, PDEs involve partial derivatives with respect to two or more independent variables. 

    • What are the common types of PDEs?

      PDEs are generally classified into three types based on their characteristics: 

      • Elliptic: e.g., Laplace’s equation 
      • Parabolic: e.g., the heat equation 
      • Hyperbolic: e.g., the wave equation 
    • What role do boundary and initial conditions play?
      • Boundary conditions specify the behavior of the solution along the edges of the domain. 
      • Initial conditions are used in time-dependent problems to define the state of the system at the start. 
    • What methods are commonly used to solve PDEs?

      There are several techniques, including: 

      • Analytical methods like separation of variables, Fourier and Laplace transforms, and the method of characteristics 
      • Numerical methods such as finite difference, finite element, and spectral methods 
    • What is the method of separation of variables?

      This method assumes that the solution can be written as a product of functions, each depending on only one of the independent variables. This assumption reduces the PDE to a set of simpler ODEs that can be solved individually.

    • In which fields are PDEs applied?

      PDEs model a wide range of phenomena across various fields including physics (heat transfer, fluid dynamics), engineering (stress analysis, electromagnetics), finance (option pricing models), and more. 

    • What distinguishes linear from nonlinear PDEs?
      • Linear PDEs have terms that are linear with respect to the unknown function and its derivatives, making them more tractable analytically. 
      • Nonlinear PDEs include terms that are nonlinear, often leading to complex behaviors and requiring specialized methods for solution. 
    • How do you determine the order of a PDE?

      The order of a PDE is defined by the highest derivative (partial derivative) present in the equation. For example, if the highest derivative is a second derivative, the PDE is second order. 

    • What are some common challenges in solving PDEs?

      Challenges include finding closed-form analytical solutions, handling complex geometries and boundary conditions, and the significant computational effort required for accurate numerical solutions. 

    Knowledge Bases
    Scroll to Top